Critically Endangered Colombian Glaciers Face Extinction

Daniel Henryk Rasolt
Interdisciplinary and intercultural researcher and writer. Founder and Chief Editor of The InterPlex.
A nexus for collaborative content, dialogue, understanding and action in an interconnected world

Tropical mountain glaciers are rapidly melting around the world (up to 99% are in South America), but those that remain in Colombia could be entirely gone before 2050.

Colombia has six remaining designated glaciers, in four distinct glacierized areas. The four areas are the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, the Sierra Nevada de El Cocuy, Nevado del Huila volcano and three glaciated volcanoes within Los Nevados National Park (Nevado del Santa Isabel, Nevado del Tolima and Nevado del Ruiz). The volcanoes of Los Nevados National park and Nevado del Huila are part of the Cordillera Central of the Andes, Sierra Nevada de El Cocuy is part of the Cordillera Oriental of the Andes and the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta is a coastal mountain range independent from the Andes. These glaciers have been losing ice mass for more than 150 years, since the “Little Ice Age”(LIA), but the scale and speed of this glacial melt has grown exponentially over the past 20-50 years.

Since the end of the LIA (estimated to have occured around 1850, 90% of Colombia’s ice mass has been lost, from an estimated total of 374 square kilometers (144 square miles) to only 37 square kilometers (14 square miles) in 2017, according to Colombia’s Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (IDEAM). In the 20th century, eight glaciers disappeared, all on mountains whose peaks are below 4,800 meters (15,750 feet). These eight extinct glaciers had an estimated 24 square kilometers (9.3 square miles) of glacierized area at the end of the LIA. The remaining glaciated mountains in Colombia are between 4,950 meters (16,240 feet) for Santa Isabel and 5,775 meters (18,947 feet) for Pico Cristobal Colon in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, which is world’s highest coastal mountain.

image 3
Geographic Location of Colombia’s Remaining Glaciers. Source: IDEAM.

The decline of the six remaining glaciers has been speeding up. Since the middle of the 20th century, glacial area in Colombia has declined by more than 60%, and since the mid 1990’s alone, the overall glacierized extent in Colombia has declined by 36 percent. According to a study published in 2017 by renowned glaciologist Antoine Rabatel and collaborators, including Jorge Luis Ceballos at IDEAM, between the mid 1940’s and mid 1970’s, the surface area loss of Colombian glaciers was approximately one percent annually. However, in line with glacial loss from other Tropical Glaciers in the Andes and around the world, “Since the mid-1970s, the mean annual surface area loss rate has increased continuously, reaching −3% per year during the current decade in average for all the Colombian glacierized areas.” According to IDEAM, between 2010 and mid-2017, Colombia lost 18% of its total glacierized area, and between 2016-2017 alone, 5.8% of its total glacier surface area was lost.

Tabla EvolucionAreas1960 2017 1
Colombia’s Declining Glacierized Surface Area, 1960 – 2017. Source: IDEAM.

The increase in surface area loss rate of glaciers since the mid 1970’s has occurred on all six defined Colombian glaciers, but not uniformly. The smaller and lower elevation glaciers of the Santa Isabel and Tolima volcanoes have seen the most dramatic reduction in glacial extent over this time period, compared to the higher elevation and larger glaciers of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta and Sierra Nevada de El Cocuy. Nonetheless, they are all on trajectories towards extinction given even the most optimistic projections for global climate change.  

PROFILING COLOMBIA’S REMAINING GLACIERS AND THE COMMUNITIES AND ECOSYSTEMS THAT DEPEND ON THEM

Looking specifically at the chronicles and decline of the six remaining Colombian glaciers puts into perspective just how close they are to disappearing, and the sociocultural and ecosystematic impacts that will be felt when they are gone.

SIERRA NEVADA DE SANTA MARTA

The Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, the highest coastal mountain range in the world, has had her glaciers reduced from 82 square kilometers (32 square miles) in surface area at the end of the LIA in 1850 down to 6.7 square kilometers (2.6 square miles) in 2017. Unlike Colombia’s other defined glacierized areas, the glaciers of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta are not, and never were, a single ice mass, and presently consist of 38 different isolated ice masses. Although many of these ice masses are at higher altitude than other glaciers in Colombia, their isolation from each other makes them more vulnerable to permanent ice mass loss. Overall the surface area loss rate of glaciers in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta is high, despite their greater elevation. From 2016-2017, 5.5% of the total glaciated area of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta was lost.

The glacial melt of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta helps feed various rivers that are born in the cloud forests of the Sierra. These rivers support both agriculture and an “irreplaceable” richness of biodiversity that lives on the slopes of the Sierra, much of it endemic. In birds alone, there are more than 600 identified species, of which 18 species and 55 subspecies are endemic.

One of the rivers born in the Sierra is the Rancheria, which flows from its watershed in the cloud forests to the semi-arid desert region of La Guajira, Colombia. It is here in La Guajira where the Wayuu tribe is suffering from extended drought and contamination of water supplies due to climate change, mining activities, and the damming and decreasing flow of the Rancheria.

The four indigenous tribes of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta; the Arhuaco, Kogui, Kankuamo and Wiwa, all consider the mountains and their glaciers to be sacred. The Arhuaco in particular, in their worldview called “kunsamu” in the Arhuaco language Iku, believe the glaciers of the Sierra, known as “Umunukunu,” to be the center of the universe, as do their close high sierra brothers, the Kogui.

Kunsam%C3%BA2015
“Kunsamu” – Vannessa Circe – Oil on Canvas – 2015.

The Arhuaco symbolize the entire geography of their sacred territory, and associate the mountains in particular with the human body. The glaciers at the peaks of the mountains represent the head, the lakes and “paramos” represent the heart, and the rivers that flow from the glaciers, lakes and paramos of the Sierra represent the veins. In traditional Arhuaco dress, the men wear conical white “tutusomas” on their heads, to symbolize their connection to the snow-capped peaks of the Sierra. The tutusoma is a very strong part of the Arhuaco identity.

The Arhuaco and the other three tribes of the Sierra consider themselves to be “older brothers,” in charge of protecting the mother earth, while the rest of us are “younger brothers” that currently do damage to the natural world. The “mamos,” which are the spiritual leaders of the Arhuaco and Kogui, believe us younger brothers are bringing about the end of the world through our careless treatment of nature. According to a mamo in the Arhuaco village of Jerwa, “We protect the mother earth and try to restore her balance, but if our younger brothers do not change their ways, the world will die.” If the glaciers of the Sierra disappear, for the Arhuaco it is like losing the head of the mother earth that they feel is their natural duty to protect.

SIERRA NEVADA DEL COCUY

The glaciers of the Sierra Nevada del Cocuy (also referred to as “Guican”) are likely to be the last of Colombia’s glaciers to fully disappear, but their recession and eventual disappearance could be the most impactful.

El Cocuy is historically the largest glacierized area in Colombia (nearly 150 square kilometers, or 58 square miles, of glacier area at the end of the LIA), and remains so at 13,3 square kilometers (5.1 square miles). Despite this more than 90% reduction, and a significant amount of fragmentation, the glaciers of El Cocuy represent 36% of Colombia’s total remaining glacierized area as of 2017.

The highest point of the Sierra Nevada del Cocuy is the glaciated peak, Ritacuba Blanco at 5,380 meters (17,651 feet). There have been in situ mass-balance studies performed on Ritacuba Blanco since 2008 (the only other mountain in Colombia with in situ studies is Santa Isabel volcano). Monthly measurements of accumulation and ablation are taken and analyzed. With nearly a decade of analysis, a clear “unbalanced situation” has been uncovered, where the mean altitude of the glaciers of El Cocuy (4,910 meters, or 16,109 feet) are 120 meters (394 feet) below the balanced-budget equilibrium-line altitude of 5,030 meters (16,503 feet) determined by the in situ mass balance measurements on Ritacuba Blanco glacier. This mass-balance disparity is growing annually. Combining these mass-balance studies with observed glaciated surface area decreases from satellite imagery (that showed a 4.8% decrease in glaciated surface area between 2016-2017 alone) allows for more concrete conclusions to be made concerning glacial volume loss, and the trends are clear; most, if not all, of El Cocuy’s glaciers will be gone by 2050.

The glacial melt of the Sierra Nevada del Cocuy augments two of Colombia’s most important rivers that flow through unique ecosystems and zones of intensive agriculture; the Orinoco river to the Southeast and the mighty Magdalena river basin that flows through Colombia’s central heartland, to the West of El Cocuy. Glacial melt from El Cocuy also feeds many smaller rivers and streams that flow through the paramos and cloud forests along its slopes. It is in the cloud forests where the majority of the local U’Wa tribe lives.

The U’Wa indigenous people are extremely spiritual and renowned for being active conservationists. They gained international notoriety for dramatic threats of mass suicide in the 1990’s, in a successful protest against the exploitation of their territory in the Andean cloud forests by multinational oil company Occidental petroleum, which formed a partnership with Colombian state-owned Ecopetrol.

In their world view, the U’Wa believe in a supreme creator of the world, called “Siria,” who is also the guardian of the “mother earth,” which itself is represented by numerous deities (“Kanuar’a” is the creator of mountains, “Yaksowa” is the creator of water, “Busana” is the father of the U’wa people and other indigenous peoples, for example). According to the U’wa. when humans destroy the mother earth, through resource extraction or other forms of blatant disrespect, Siria punishes people through events like earthquakes and volcano eruptions, so preserving the natural world is critical spiritually and for survival. The U’wa consider the Sierra Nevada del Cocuy to be extremely sacred, and have battled government authorities, multinational corporations and disrespectful tourists alike, to protect the integrity of the mountains and their glaciers. In the U’Wa language, U’wa Ajka, El Cocuy is called “Zizuma.”

Recession 1
“Recession” – Vannessa Circe – Oil on Canvas – 2017.

The impacts of losing the glaciers of Mount Zizuma for the U’wa will be profound, beyond the extensive environmental and agricultural consequences that will come from the diminished water supply in their cloud forest territory. In a 1997 letter to the Colombian public, the U’wa explained the spiritual importance of the rivers in their territories, most of which originate or are fed by the glaciers of Mount Zizuma: “Our rivers are not just rivers. Through them we communicate with our deities. They are the messengers and the messages flow in both directions. If they are polluted or if they die, we will no longer know what the gods want, and neither will the gods hear our cries nor our thanks.”

LOS NEVADOS NATIONAL PARK AND NEVADO DEL HUILA

SANTA ISABEL AND TOLIMA VOLCANOES

Two glaciated volcanoes within Los Nevados national park in the Tolima department of Colombia, Santa Isabel (4,950 meters, or 16,240 feet) and Nevado del Tolima (5,215 meters, or 17,110 feet), will be the first two of the six remaining Colombian glaciers to completely lose their ice mass.

Santa Isabel has already seen its ice mass decrease from 27.8 square kilometers(10.7 square miles) in 1850 to 0.63 square kilometers (0.24 square miles) in 2018. The past few years have seen an especially dramatic recession in Santa Isabel’s glaciers. According to IDEAM, between January 2016 and February 2018, Santa Isabel lost an incredible 37% of its glaciated surface area. This rapid loss is attributed mainly to the lower altitude and smaller size of Santa Isabel and rising atmospheric temperatures (it is generally accepted that small tropical glaciers below 5,000 meters, or 16,400 feet, are especially sensitive to warming temperatures due to climate change). Recent (2015-2016) strong El Nino events which resulted in stronger solar radiation and reduced snowfall due to less precipitation and cloud cover, increased melting that exposed volcanic ash that absorbs more heat than ice (lower reflectivity, or albedo), and possibly decreased regional precipitation over the past decade, may also have contributed to the rapid glacial recession on Santa Isabel.

The “La Conejeras” glacier on Santa Isabel has been the most extensively studied of all of Colombia’s glaciers, with analysis not only of surface area loss rate through satellite imagery, but also in situ measurements of ice thickness and surface mass balance, being collected over the past 10-13 years. Combining these measurements portends that all glacial ice mass on Santa Isabel could be gone within the next five years.

In comparison, between 2016-2017, Nevado del Tolima lost 7.1% of its glaciated surface area, but Tolima’s glaciated surface area was already the smallest of Colombia’s remaining glaciers, down from 8.6 square kilometers (3.3 square miles) in 1850 to 0.58 square kilometers (0.22 square miles) in 2017.

These two glaciers are close to densely populated regions with intensive agriculture, mining and hydroelectric dams. Since the glaciers are already so small compared to historical levels, their disappearance will have a relatively small impact on local practices that have been growing alongside the rapid recession of the glaciers. These urban and agricultural regions are likely to suffer much more from issues related to land degradation from unsustainable land-use and extractive industries, and future extended droughts and overall decreases in precipitation as global climate change advances.

NEVADO DEL RUIZ

nevado del ruiz complete
From the active crater on the summit of Nevado del Ruiz. Photo by D.H. Rasolt.

Nevado del Ruiz is Colombia’s second highest volcano at 5,321 meters (17,457 feet), but historically the most active and damaging to human settlement. Nevado del Ruiz erupted in 1985 after 69 years of dormancy, and buried the town of Armero, killing more than 20,000 people out of a population of 29,000, in what came to be known as the “Armero tragedy.” There had been some advance warning through detected seismic activity between 1984 and 1985, but unfortunately not enough was done to evacuate the populace of Armero in time. Many still blame government inaction and incompetence for the tragedy.

While not the largest driver of glacial loss over decadal time scales, the eruptions and geothermal activity on the four glaciated and active volcanoes of Colombia (Santa Isabel, Tolima, Ruiz and Huila) also have the potential to contribute to glacial ice loss in the future, as they have done so in the past. The 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz caused an increased glacial surface loss rate between 1985 and the late 1990’s (an estimated 1.5 times the glacial loss caused by climatic changes alone), including an immediate melting of parts of the glacier due to “pyroclastic flows” (hot gas and volcanic debris from the crater), and ensuing “lahars” (landslides and mudflows), which are what buried Armero. Since 2010, Nevado del Ruiz has shown increased volcanic activity, with volcanic ash having mixed effects of potentially reducing solar radiation near the peak and increasing absorption of radiation within the ash, while also isolating some of the glacier from radiation when the ash level is thick enough.

At the end of the LIA in 1850, Nevado del Ruiz had 47.5 square kilometers (18.3 square miles) of glacial surface area. From 2016-2017, Nevado del Ruiz lost 7% of its glaciated area, or 0.63 square kilometers (0.24 square miles), leaving it with 8.7 square kilometers (3.36 square miles) of glacierized surface area.

NEVADO DEL HUILA

Nevado del Huila is Colombia’s highest volcano at 5,364 meters (17,598 feet), and recently its most active. The volcano was dormant for nearly half a millenia, but in 2007 started to come to life again. Since 2007, the glacier covering the summit of Nevado del Huila has been fragmented into two parts due to the ash and heat from this volcanic activity, and in 2008 there were multiple eruptions on the volcano. Since 2018 there has been further increased volcanic activity on Nevado del Huila, and a heightened alert of eruptions and earthquakes. The volcanic activity on Nevado del Huila was responsible for recent seismic events, with earthquakes and aftershocks being felt as far away as Bogota (more than 250 kilometers, or 155 miles) in January 2019. As of writing (May 2019), Nevado del Huila remains under level yellow alert.

Nevado del Huila is Colombia’s southernmost glacier, and its melt is an important water source for the entire Paez river basin, which drains into Colombia’s largest Andean river basin, the Magdalena. Due to its higher altitude and an ice mass that was only recently fragmented into two pieces, Nevado del Huila has the lowest glacial surface area loss rate of all Colombian glaciers. From 2016-2017, 2.7% of Nevado del Huila’s total glaciated area was lost, leaving it with 7.1 square kilometers (2.74 square miles) of glacierized surface area. At the end of the LIA in 1850, Nevado del Huila had 33.7 square kilometers (13 square miles) of glacierized surface area, so overall 79% of glacierized surface area on Nevado del Huila has been lost.

Nevado del Huila sits in the current and ancestral territory of the Nasa indigenous people, who are also referred to as “Paez.” For the Nasa, Nevado del Huila holds special significance, for creation myths, symbolism and traditional medicine ceremonies that use melt-water that comes directly from the glacier. In the Nasa language, “nasa yuwe,” Nevado del Huila is called “Yändy,” with the name specifically referencing the glaciated peak. The Nasa are a proud and very activist tribe that is constantly fighting to preserve their land and culture, often in the face of violence. The eventual disappearance of the glaciers on their sacred snow-capped volcano will be another blow to their pride and tradition.

A GLACIERLESS FUTURE FOR COLOMBIA

There is some uncertainty as to exactly when the remainder of Colombia’s glaciers will disappear, due to insufficient data. Satellite imagery showing rapid and accelerating recession of glacierized surface area on all of Colombia’s remaining glaciers can only concretely say so much about future speed of glacial recession. Without in situ measurements of mass balance, ice thickness and total glacial volume, it is impossible for scientists to fully understand the internal scale and mechanisms that will lead to full ice mass loss. Nonetheless, without drastic mitigation strategies for climate change that help level off warming temperatures by the mid 21st century, there is little doubt in the eyes of experts that all of Colombia’s remaining glaciers will go the way of well-studied Nevado del Santa Isabel in the near future. According to Antoine Rabatel and colleagues, “Considering the imbalance of the glaciers in Colombia with the current climate conditions, the relatively low altitude of the Colombian glaciers and the expected changes in air temperature for the twenty-first century, most of them will most likely disappear in the coming decades and only the largest ones located on the highest summits will persist until the second half of the twenty first century…glaciers on the Nevado del Tolima will likely disappear before 2030, and most of the glaciers in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta and Sierra Nevada de El Cocuy before 2050.”

Colombia is certainly not the only country at risk of losing most or all of its glacial ice mass in the coming decades of advancing climate change, and in certain other parts of the world the water scarcity and impacts on agricultural systems will be more profound than in Colombia. Peru and Bolivia in the Andes, and the densely-populated countries that depend on the glacial melt from the Tibetan plateau for their water and food supplies (such as Nepal, Bhutan, Northern India and Pakistan, with Pakistan being particularly vulnerable due to its arid climate and dependence on the glacial runoff feeding the Indus river), will be profoundly impacted. As nations battle over scarce resources, melting mountain glaciers could certainly lead to an international crisis.

In Colombia, high Andean wetland ecosystems known as “paramos,” have been helping and will continue to help buffer against some of the worst impacts of Colombia’s disappearing glaciers, as long as these paramos are properly preserved. Paramos, however, are also at risk due to climate change and anthropogenic land use like mining and agriculture.

The disappearance of Colombia’s glaciers will nonetheless have impacts on the health and productivity of many thousands of Colombians, who depend on these glaciers to some degree for drinking water, agriculture, mining and hydroelectricity. Colombia’s Tropical Glaciers are also important indicators of both regional and global climate change, so their loss, especially before rigorous study, is a strategic loss for better understanding past, present and future climate change.

The recession and disappearance of Colombia’s glaciers in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, the Sierra Nevada de El Cocuy and atop Nevado del Huila, will also have profound cultural and spiritual impacts that run far deeper than the quantifiable losses of partially replaceable water resources.  Glaciers and their meltwater are sacred for the indigenous people of these territories, and their disappearance will lead to the further recession of these cultures, at a time when the world most needs to hear their voices.

References and Further Reading

Favier, V., Wagnon, P., and Ribstein, P. “Glaciers of the outer and inner tropics: A different behaviour but a common response to climatic forcing.” Geophysical Research Letters. August 2004.

Hide, Stephen. “El Cocuy: Trouble on the mountain, resolution on the horizon?” The City Paper. Bogota. February 2017.

IDEAM. “Informe del Estado de los Glaciares Colombianos.” 2018.

Izquierdo, Rebeca. “The Thinking People: The U’Wa Battle Oxy.” Cultural Survival. 2001.

“Manifiesto del Pueblo U’Wa.” 1997.

New Scientist. “The History of Ice on Earth.” May 2010.

Rabatel, A., Francou, B., Wagnon, P., et al.. “Current state of glaciers in the tropical Andes: a multi-century perspective on glacier evolution and climate change.” The Cryosphere. January 2013.

Rabatel, A., Ceballos, J.L., Zemp, M., et al..“Toward an imminent extinction of Colombian glaciers?” Geografiska Annaler. 2017.

Romo, Vanessa. “Peru: A Decade-Long Quest to Protect the World’s Largest Tropical Glacier.” Mongabay. July 2018.

Saout, S.L., Hoffmann, M., Rodrigues, A., et al.. “Protected Areas and Effective Biodiversity Conservation.” Science. November 2013.

Thompson, L., Mosley-Thompson, E., Davis, M.E., Brecher, H.H., “Tropical glaciers, recorders and indicators of climate change, are disappearing globally.” Annals of Glaciology. 2011.

University of Chicago. “The Energy Budget of Glaciers.”

Vuille, M., Rabatel, A., Sicart, J.E., et al.. “Rapid decline of snow and ice in the tropical Andes – Impacts, uncertainties and challenges ahead.” Earth Science Reviews. January 2018.

Vuille, M. “Climate Change and Water Resources in the Tropical Andes.” Inter-American Development Bank. 2013.

Wilkinson, Allie. “Expanding tropics will play greater global role, report predicts.” Science. June 2014.

Zemp, M., Cogley, J.G., et al..Global glacier mass changes and their contributions to sea-level rise from 1961 to 2016. Nature. April 2019.


Banner image: The active crater of Nevado del Ruiz. Photo by D.H. Rasolt.

This articles was first published by Unbounded World. Read the original article.

Authors
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
Interdisciplinary and intercultural researcher and writer. Founder and Chief Editor of The InterPlex.

I am an independent interdisciplinary researcher and writer with a background in physics. I am the Founder of Unbounded World, an initiative which provides an integrated approach to ecological and cultural preservation, and The InterPlex, a new hybrid-style publication and collaborative community that focuses on the interdisciplinary, intercultural and interconnected.

More
Contributors
Teyrungʉmʉ Torres Zalabata
Indigenous Arhuaco physicist. Leader of the Agua Maestra collective. Masters student at the National University of Colombia.

I am a proud member of the Arhuaco People from the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta of Northern Colombia. I am also the first trained Arhuaco physicist, having received my degree from the National University of Colombia, where I am currently completing my masters thesis. I am also a leader of the Agua Maestra collective, a community-based initiative in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta that is focused on education and the environment. I am interested in collaborating on intercultural and interscientific issues, searching for meeting points of mutual respect and understanding between Indigenous and Western science, from fundamental physics to social and ecological issues.

 

More
Login or Join our community to leave a comment
Share this article
A nexus for collaborative content, dialogue, understanding and action in an interconnected world
Share this article
No data was found
No data was found
10

Related Publications

August 5, 2026
For Afro-Pacific communities, biodiversity and cultural heritage are not separate concerns—protecting one means protecting the other. Their interrelation makes a compelling case for biocultural heritage as a framework for research, governance, and conservation.
Rowan-Glass_Bogota_8-17-22
Rowan Glass
Contributors
July 16, 2026
Earth’s Memory, Part One Abstract Every rock carries a fragment of Earth’s memory. Collectively, these fragments preserve an extraordinary geological record spanning more than 4.5 billion years of planetary evolution. This article traces that record through the deep-time history of our planet—from the formation of Earth’s earliest crust and the Great Oxidation Event, when microbial life transformed the planet’s atmosphere, to the five great mass extinctions that repeatedly reset the trajectory of life, and the Snowball Earth episodes, when our planet experienced its most extreme glaciation. Drawing on more than two decades of fieldwork across Himalaya and Peninsular India, among ancient rocks, minerals, and fossils that bear direct witness to these planetary transformations, it explores how geologists reconstruct Earth’s early history from evidence preserved in the geological archives. Taken together, these geological events reveal a recurring pattern: Earth is a dynamic system in which every major crisis has also created the conditions for new and often more complex forms of life to evolve. That pattern, written into rocks billions of years old, continues to shape the planet today.    I first learned to listen to rocks long before I had the words to describe what that meant.  It began in the Himalaya, the youngest mountain range on Earth, still rising, still deforming, and still recording the ongoing collision between continents. During my early fieldwork, I spent long days mapping folded strata, tracing fault scarps, and trying to understand how landscapes preserve evidence of processes operating across vastly different geological timescales. At that time, I often felt that the mountains were trying to say something in a language I had not yet learned. Over time, through fieldwork, mapping, and countless hours spent among rocks and sediments, I began to decipher that silent language.  The lesson deepened across many other landscapes of India....
Jai
Jaishri Sanwal Bhatt
Contributors
January 29, 2026
Is self-organization the answer to the foundational question of why life exhibits such complexity? And can it also serve as a guiding framework for how best to save complex webs of biodiversity amid the onslaughts of the modern world? Self-organization exists throughout nature and socioeconomic structures. It refers to the spontaneous emergence of collective, complex order within a disordered system, due to localized interactions that follow simple rules, and occurring without external controls. While conceptually abstract, given that uncertainty lies at its core, the applications of self-organization are everywhere. Advancing our understanding of the non-linear processes within complex systems that drive self-organization is also becoming increasingly important for developing evidence-based policies in a world defined by interdependence and escalating stressors. Indigenous cultures, such as those that live within complex socio-ecological systems in the Amazon ecoregion, have long embraced these principles of uncertainty, interconnectedness, and non-linear dynamics. How will their wisdom, experience, and models of socio-ecological systems integrate with evidence-based policies for protecting the Amazon ecoregion? Safeguarding the Amazon is one of our world’s most pressing, complex, and vital global challenges. Among the strategies gaining traction, supported by increasing financial investment, is the intriguing proposition to transform a portion of the region’s immense biodiversity into a sustainable “bioeconomy.” However, these proposals, and the policy makers responsible for negotiating their implementation across boundaries and cultures, often lack an understanding of how both economies and ecologies self-organize and scale. Data-driven models of self-organization and critical collective phenomena in the natural world and within traditional Indigenous sociocultural structures, along with adaptive context-based frameworks, can help guide the transboundary development of a decentralized and circular socio-bioeconomy for the Amazon. Self-Organized Criticality and the Edge of Chaos Pioneering research on self-organized criticality (SOC) began in the 1980s and was made accessible to a wider audience by...
DSC07445
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
December 15, 2025
In the context of risk management and in the face of environmental and economic challenges such as climate change, coastal erosion, water insecurity, and the accelerated loss of biodiversity, among others, the concept of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) has emerged. Over the past decade, this appealing concept has been consolidated as an integrative approach that seeks to address socio-environmental challenges through the sustainable management of socio-ecological systems.  The United Nations Environment Assembly defines NbS as “actions that protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural or modified ecosystems to effectively and adaptively address societal challenges, simultaneously providing benefits for human well-being and biodiversity.” In this way, NbS represents a paradigm shift from traditional solutions based exclusively on grey infrastructure, which are now insufficient in facing many large and complex contemporary challenges. The relevance of NbS resides in their capacity to generate multiple, synergistic benefits through ecosystem services and the strengthening of socio-ecological resilience. This approach recognizes the interdependence of nature and culture, and much of its success depends on how communities perceive and acknowledge the multiple benefits socio-ecological systems provide for human well-being. Therefore, NbS must emphasize the need for participatory, equitable, and inclusive processes to ensure their legitimacy and long-term sustainability. NbS encompass actions for the protection, restoration, and sustainable management of ecosystems. Although they offer multifunctional and cost-effective benefits, their implementation faces diverse challenges. Several international frameworks acknowledge NbS as priority strategies to confront climate change and biodiversity loss, promoting guidelines for their adoption at different scales. Among these frameworks are the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992), the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), the Sendai Framework (2015–30), and the Paris Agreement (2015). However, it is not enough to only secure financing or display technical feasibility. It is also necessary to establish a coherent legal framework, generate open and...
PeriodicoUNAL-090623-03-am - Mancera-cut
Jose Ernesto Mancera Pineda
Contributors
November 24, 2025
Investment in science is a pillar for any dynamic, equitable modern society, and promoting scientific literacy across all levels of society can help foster innovation, dialogue, and consensus that crosses disciplinary and cultural boundaries. Science also helps to uncover answers to foundational questions that have captivated, confounded, and divided our species for millennia. But what is “science,” and what kind of “evidence” ensures that an approach is scientific? If we take “science” to broadly mean, in its purest sense, a “dynamic search for the truth,” or more explicitly, “the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence,” as the Science Council aptly defines it, then science extends beyond the established, highly specialized disciplines of reductionist natural sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, geoscience, and space science) that have been so successful in fostering our understanding of our planet and the cosmos. Under this definition, science also includes the rigorous data-driven (qualitative and quantitative) social sciences, the inherently non-reductionist “holistic” sciences such as ecological and Earth system sciences, and the budding interdisciplinary field of complex systems science, as well as robust traditional knowledge systems based on multi-generational experiences, observations, and reasoning. As with science, “evidence” can mean a lot of things as well, including primary research, pre-existing data, past and planned experiments, and the referencing of peer-reviewed publications and primary sources. It can also include local and traditional knowledge, thought experiments, theoretical proofs, contemplation, verifiable personal experience, and empirical observation. Broadening and weaving together these forms of scientific evidence holds the potential to address complex, interconnected global challenges and explain deep mysteries that could help unify our polarized societies around foundational understandings. Foundational Questions Foundational questions can transcend the divides of generations and cultures: Cosmology, physics, and evolutionary biology have shed...
DSC07445
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
November 10, 2025
Earth Observation technologies are becoming increasingly valuable for understanding our changing world. They are also critical for formulating policies to protect ecosystems and support local communities. The availability of imagery taken from satellites, airplanes, and drones offers opportunities to detect deforestation, glacier melting, crop productivity, hurricane alerts, ocean temperatures, and much more. These applications have become wide-spread and are commonly featured in the news and on social media; an informed public can now be acutely aware of the significant effects that humans have on the landscape. However, other processes of land use change are too complex to be detected and understood solely from space. For example, detecting rich minerals, tracking illicit land activities (e.g., coca farming), and monitoring water salinity. For these and other complex land changes, the imagery itself might not be enough to understand the processes shaping these changes in the landscape. New ways of addressing these are needed. About 26 years ago, Jacqueline Geoghegan and her co authors wrote a chapter in the book People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science, titled “Socializing the Pixel and Pixelizing the Social in Land-Use and Land-Cover Change.” This chapter was a pioneering step forward in extracting more information from images and linking them with the social processes behind them. It helped me during my PhD studies and subsequent research to develop a strategy for connecting quantitative data from pixels with social mechanisms that impact land change. But how do these two approaches work together? The full Interdialogue with Paulo Murillo. The role of classification in traditional land use science relies on how effectively we can classify elements on the land surface. Classification is the most relevant task in remote sensing. We want to classify or differentiate between forests and agricultural fields or among diverse types of crops using...
new_paulo
Paulo Murillo
Contributors

Login

Sign up to get The InterPlex newsletter

Update Password

Update Password *
Confirm New Password *