Deforestation in Colombia: The Complex and Interconnected Drivers

Colombia is the world’s most biodiverse country by area, but its rich forested ecosystems are facing existential threats.
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
Interdisciplinary and intercultural researcher and writer. Founder and Chief Editor of The InterPlex.
A nexus for collaborative content, dialogue, understanding and action in an interconnected world

Deforestation is on the rise in megadiverse Colombia. Attempting to understand the complex and interconnected web of social, political, economic and environmental drivers of deforestation in Colombia – past and present, legal and illicit, direct and indirect – is critical. 

The Covid-19 pandemic has emboldened land-grabbers and illegal gold miners since late March of this year due to a diminished state presence and the self-imposed isolation of vulnerable Indigenous communities who have long served as stewards of these forests.

In a dark paradox, some of South America’s most precious ecosystems were preserved during the more than half-century-long civil war between the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia), the Colombian Government and mercenary paramilitary groups. The war left nearly 300,000 people dead and more than seven million people displaced.

A lack of infrastructure, industry and rural development, along with a foreign fear of investment in rural Colombia due to the very real risk of violence, extortion and kidnapping, all contributed in different ways to much of Colombia’s rich tropical forests being left intact.

Hotspots

The FARC held influence over more than 30 percent of Colombian territory, principally in remote and sparsely populated forested regions.

As a guerilla group that ended up funding itself mostly through the illicit cocaine and gold trades, with some supplementary income from kidnapping, wildlife trafficking and illegal logging, the FARC depended upon an ability to hide the movement of their soldiers, and their illicit economic activities.

They drew up “coexistence manuals” and clear command structures with local peasants, coca growers and Indigenous communities, while imposing rules against deforestation in territories where they held major influence. For the FARC these frameworks served to directly protect themselves and their economic interests, and to promote their legitimacy both locally and nationally.

Circe Vannessa A Harsh Reality
“A Harsh Reality” – Vannessa Circe – Oil on Canvas – 24″ x 48″

While the war was and continues to be a humanitarian crisis, FARC’s presence likely delayed extensive deforestation.

The internationally acclaimed signing of the peace accords between the FARC and Colombian government in November 2016 left pronounced power vacuums within extensive forested territories, and there has since been a major spike in deforestation. The Colombian Amazon in particular has become a global deforestation “hotspot.”

Drivers

To address the current rapid rates of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon, it is important to understand the complex context and the interconnected socio-ecological drivers of deforestation over the past several decades.

Forests along the densely populated Andean mountain slopes, the Atlantic coast and along the colonization frontiers of the Amazon, have been cleared en masse for decades in Colombia, but until recently the highland Andean forests and paramos, and lowland tropical forests, remained largely preserved.

The original colonizers and deforesters of the Colombian Amazon were rubber planters in the early twentieth century, who enslaved tens-of-thousands of local Indigenous people, causing incalculable long-term biocultural damage. They were followed by migrants that fled a civil war between Liberals and Conservatives in the mid-twentieth century, an episode that laid the seeds for the formation of the FARC.

The mass-scale conversion of the region from forest to cow pasture only began in the 1960’s though, with long-since abandoned  state-sponsored infrastructure projects that brought large waves of new colonizers. Since then much of the forested landscape on the frontiers of the Colombian Amazon - especially in the high-conflict departments of Caqueta and Putumayo - has been transformed into cow pastures and coca plantations.

The largest direct driver of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon – and many other parts of Colombia and South America – is the expansion of cow pastures. Interestingly, the global demand and price for beef has not driven the mass conversion of forest to pasture in Colombia, as opposed to other countries with a larger export market for beef and dairy products.

Cow pastures are an extremely unproductive use of land in Colombia, and although 38 percent of the country (38.6 million hectares) is being used for an estimated 23 million head of cattle, analysis has shown that only 6 percent of land in Colombia is actually optimal for cattle grazing.

Landgrabs

It is often illegal land grabbing and the perverse law of titling any “productive” land in Colombia that has driven this expansion of cow pastures in the Colombian Amazon. Land is power in Colombia, and the struggle for land has been the main driver of conflict, displacement, death and environmental destruction for many decades.

The process of land-grabbing and clearing is frequently done by smallholder farmers, who then sell the newly deforested plots to wealthy landowners – known as “latifundios” – to be consolidated into large cattle ranches and territorial control that allows for more profitable illicit activities in the background.

In terms of land distribution, Colombia has one of the world’s highest levels of inequality, with around one percent of landowners in Colombia holding 81 percent of nominally “productive” land. Furthermore, a prodigious 44.7 percent of Colombia’s rural population is estimated to live in poverty.

This land-grabbing process even happens in and around constitutionally protected areas such as national parks and Indigenous territories, especially where roads – both state-sponsored and illegal – have been constructed. Typically roads encourage urbanization due to easier access to markets and natural resources, which leads to a further increased demand for land. Areas around roads become obvious places to clear forests and replace them with cattle in order to claim “land use” and legal ownership.

Infrastructure

Hydroelectric dam constructions and operations, and the expanded infrastructure that they require, have been staples of the Colombian economy and landscape for several decades. More than 70 percent of Colombia’s domestic electricity consumption is generated by hydroelectric dams.

The connection between large dams, deforestation and land degradation is strong: they flood forests, directly destroying habitats and displacing forest communities, while also bringing infrastructure that often indirectly leads to further deforestation.

Dams also change seasonal flood patterns and sediment flows, which impacts lowland forests downstream, including coastal mangrovesflood-lakes and the Amazon.

Established extractive industries in Colombia include oil and natural gas exploration and exploitation, as well as the mining of gold, silver, platinum, coal, salt, emerald, nickel, coltan, copper and more. Oil is Colombia’s primary export and Colombia is Latin America’s largest coal exporter. Colombia is also one of the world’s largest exporters of gold -most of it illegally mined, but since it is nearly impossible to trace it enters the market “legally.”

Furthermore, Colombia is the fourth largest producer of palm oil in the world, and the largest in the Western Hemisphere. Despite greenwashed claims of “zero deforestation” and post-conflict “sustainable development,” the reality of Colombia’s expanding palm oil supply chain is far more complex and destructive.

Coca

Often in the background of these legal industries and extensive cow pastures are notorious and highly lucrative illicit industries, namely drug-trafficking and illegal gold mining.

Coca – the base ingredient of cocaine and a sacred medicinal plant for many Indigenous peoples – is often considered to be a direct driver of deforestation in Colombia.

The Amazonian departments of Putumayo, Caqueta, Meta and Guaviare and the Southwestern Andean-Chocoan departments of Narino and Cauca are all former FARC strongholds with abundant coca plantations and abandoned infrastructure projects. Near all-but the most isolated coca plantations are cow pastures, to maintain control over the land.

ParamoPasture 1
Cow pasture is pushing up against the fragile paramo ecosystem. Cauca, Colombia. Photo by D.H. Rasolt.

Forced eradication attempts of coca have failed miserably, especially the US-backed “Plan Colombia” of the early 2000’s that called for the aerial spraying of glyphosate. Production mostly increased and deforestation frontiers expanded as coca farmers went deeper into the forests, while legal crops, natural vegetation – and possibly humans and other animals – were sickened or killed by the drifting glyphosate droplets.

In response to forced eradication attempts, small-scale coca growers often resort to alternatives like illegal gold mining that further deforests and contaminates water supplies: they see little alternative, since the land is degraded and there was little access to legal markets to begin with. Colombia – at the urging of the Trump administration – is nonetheless promising a new campaign of forced eradication, again through the aerial spraying of glyphosate.

Gold

Illegal gold mining has long been a driver of deforestation, land degradation and waterway contamination in the Choco rainforest and several other regions in Colombia.

The departments of Antioquia and Cauca in the Andes, as well as Caqueta and Putumayo in the Amazon, have been particularly impacted. “Blood Gold” has also funded past and present conflict – when the peace accords were signed, illegal gold was actually generating more money than the notorious cocaine trade for the FARC, ELN, and certain neo-paramilitary groups.

And when there are concerted state efforts to crackdown on illegal mining, the often impoverished miners are driven into other illicit activities, like coca cultivation, which again leads to further deforestation. It is a tragic and destructive cycle.

While many of the legal and illegal drivers of deforestation described above have existed in Colombia for decades, their scale and regions of influence, and the underlying socioeconomic and political circumstances that encourage their expansion or contraction, are constantly changing.

Complex conditions in “post-conflict” Colombia are presently driving deforestation deep into the Colombian Amazon.

Expansion

With the FARC demobilized, their abandoned territories have become extremely vulnerable to a range of opportunistic forces looking to fill the vacuum.

A nasty combination of new and old illegal actors violently compete for control of vast forested territories and highly profitable illicit industries. These illegal groups fight against or work along with the interests of speculating multinational mining, oil, oil palm, agriculture, timber and construction corporations. All of these groups are vying for control of new land to title, exploit, or both.

Often there are blurred lines between all of these groups, and the role that the government plays in either preventing or facilitating the intentions of these actors. This volatile mix is on top of poorly thought-out governmental “land restitution” agendas for millions of displaced victims of the civil war, the complex reintegration of former FARC combatants into society, and an already destructive system of land titling that encourages land-grabbing.

The expectation of all interested parties is that with “peace,” there will be a proliferation of infrastructure and roads – both “official” government-funded and nominally “illegal” projects – that will facilitate the extraction of natural resources.

In the midst of this chaos, the state has largely neglected the constitutionally promised safeguarding of national protected areas and Indigenous lands. Indigenous leaders and other social and environmental defenders have been threatened and killed at alarming rates to coincide with the rampant land-grabbing and deforestation around the country.

2020 saw Colombia named the most dangerous country in the world to be an environmental defender, and since the signing of the peace accords, more than 900 social and environmental leaders have been assassinated according to INDEPAZ.

Amazon 

The Colombian Amazon has become a critical “hotspot” of deforestation since the signing of the peace accords. According to data from Global Forest Watch, in 2018 Colombia experienced its highest amount of primary forest loss ever recorded, up 500 percent from 2003, and almost entirely within the Amazon.

Overall deforestation in the Colombian Amazon was up 97 percent in 2018 versus 2016, the year of the peace accords.

Ten national parks in the Colombian Amazon were abandoned earlier this year - totalling approximately nine million hectares - due to threats against neutral national park staff by FARC dissidents and other illegal armed groups. These vast parks are now even more vulnerable, and data coming from the field that may otherwise have helped prevent future deforestation and conflict throughout the region, has stopped being collected.

Illegal gold mining has also been spreading to previously untouched regions of the post-conflict Colombian Amazon, as reported recently by national park staff and Indigenous leaders. The Indigenous leaders of the Colombian Amazon have categorically rejected  the presence of both illegal and state-sanctioned “legal” gold miners within their territories.

Integrated socio-ecological research and monitoring has been shedding light on present trends and the complex forces driving the recent uninhibited deforestation of the Colombian Amazon.

Fires

Isolated forest fires – strong indicators of areas of present and future deforestation – were detected at an alarming 600 percent higher rate within protected areas in 2017. 

The departments of Caqueta, Meta, and Guaviare, all places where large-scale deforestation occurred previously, are seeing their frontiers of deforestation expand exponentially in post-conflict Colombia, but fires have also been detected in the more isolated eastern Colombian Amazon. 

CaquetaDeforestation
Active deforestation frontier in the Colombian Amazon. Caqueta, Colombia. Photo by D.H. Rasolt.

Amazon forest fire expert professor Dolors Armenteras, who was the lead author of a 2018 study that connected isolated forest fires to future deforestation in the Colombian Amazon, recently explained to me that “the vital environmental corridor between the Sierra de la Macarena, Tinigua and Cordillera de los Picachos national parks has exhibited a dramatic rise in fires and subsequent deforestation during the post-conflict period. This key biodiversity hotspot connects Andes and Amazon ecosystems.” 

If these trends continue, there is the real possibility that large sections of the Colombian Amazon will become fragmented, posing risks to numerous species and biogeochemical cycles. 

Anthropogenic forest fires and accompanying deforestation trends in the Colombian Amazon are also expected to increase with drier climatic conditions, which in certain years will be exacerbated by strong El Nino events. Drought and decreased overall precipitation throughout the Amazon – along with heavy precipitation events, flash floods and landslides – results from tragic and preventable feedback loops set in motion by deforestation. 

Mass-land clearing degrades the land, fragments the forests and directly alters local and regional precipitation patterns, while contributing to the Amazon’s march toward the tipping point of becoming a carbon source.

Biodiversity 

A study published in March 2020 that built off of professor Armenteras’ work on forest fires, compared deforestation rates within and around 39 national parks and forest reserves in the three years before (2013-2015) and after (2016-2018) the peace accords. The researchers noticed a pronounced increase in deforestation in several of the national parks that are considered “biodiversity hotspots,” from the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta in the north to Nukak Nature Reserve deep within the Amazon. 

In conjunction with illegal fires and land clearing, President Ivan Duque’s extractivist-focused National Development Plan has been doling out mining and oil exploration titles in former FARC-controlled forested areas, to multinational corporations who are anticipating increased infrastructure and security.

These concessions often come without the constitutionally guaranteed right of prior consent from communities living on those soon-to-be-exploited lands.

Running in parallel with these state-sponsored plans for established extractive industries are controversial proposals to initiate fracking, planned and in-construction mega-dams along the Magdalena and Cauca rivers, the counterproductive plan to re-initiate aerial glyphosate spraying to eradicate coca crops, and the continued expansion of oil palm plantations.

While researchers and environmental activists sound the alarm about deforestation in national parks and extractivist projects around the country, critical deforestation monitoring and modeling studies still have not been conducted in post-conflict Colombia with a proper focus on constitutionally recognized, collectively held Indigenous territories.

Land-grabbing, deforestation, illegal gold mining, forced displacement and the assasination of Indigenous leaders is rampant in these territories as well.

COVID-19

185 recognized Indigenous reserves are divided between more than 60 diverse ethnic groups in the Colombian Amazon. They account for more than double the forested area – 26 million hectares vs 12 million hectares – of national parks and forest reserves.

Murui Muina Indigenous leader Jorge Furagaro told me in March of this year, before going into Covid-19 induced isolation within his Amazonian territory: “We are the true guardians of these forests.

“Time and again Indigenous peoples in the Amazon have been shown to have less deforestation than even national parks, but we continue to be neglected, exploited, marginalized and killed.”  

Illegal actors have become further emboldened by the uncertainty surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic and associated rising global gold prices.

Spikes in forest fires and ensuing deforestation in the Colombian Amazon have been observed since Colombia went into national lockdown in late March 2020, while illegal gold miners have been encroaching upon Indigenous territories and protected areas throughout the region.

Isolation

Indigenous communities have self-imposed isolation measures in a necessary attempt to prevent the spread of Covid-19 within their communities.

Already greatly reduced in numbers after decades-to-centuries of land-grabbing, forced displacement and disease, and with minimal to no access to basic “Western” health and communication services, many isolated Indigenous communities are extremely vulnerable to this novel disease, which has been spreading rapidly throughout the Amazon.

Isolating communities are also mostly unable to receive alerts and vital information, which coupled with a reduced presence of the state and scientific researchers, has weakened their continued fight to monitor and protect the forests of their ancestral lands. These forests, if kept intact, could help prevent future pandemics.

A range of strategies are being attempted to slow the rising rates of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon. These range from internationally sponsored “results-based payment” schemes like REDD+, to military operations against peasant farmers within protected areas – but not against the large landowners, multinational corporations and illegal groups promoting the deforestation.

We have also seen the ideologically beautiful but so-far impracticable legal ruling by the Colombian Supreme Court granting legal rights of “personhood” to the entire Colombian Amazon Region.

Complexity

But none of these nor other attempts seem to fully appreciate or address the complexity of the dynamic socio-ecological mechanisms that are driving rampant deforestation and ecological destruction in the Colombian Amazon and elsewhere in the country.

Colombia is undoubtedly one of the more complicated and conflicted countries in the world, which along with its diverse ecosystems and cultures makes it a critical case.

There is an opportunity though. Understanding and successfully combating the interconnected drivers of “post-conflict” Colombia’s rising deforestation rates through a complex socio-ecological systems approach would help inform other forested parts of the world, especially those in countries and regions with poor governance, current or recent conflict, and traditional cultures.


This article was originally published by The Ecologist in August, 2020.

Banner ImageIllegal gold mines drive deforestation and water contamination. Choco, Colombia. Photo by D.H. Rasolt

Authors
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
Interdisciplinary and intercultural researcher and writer. Founder and Chief Editor of The InterPlex.

I am an independent interdisciplinary researcher and writer with a background in physics. I am the Founder of Unbounded World, an initiative which provides an integrated approach to ecological and cultural preservation, and The InterPlex, a new hybrid-style publication and collaborative community that focuses on the interdisciplinary, intercultural and interconnected.

More
Contributors
Dolors Armenteras
Landscape Ecologist. Research professor at the National University of Colombia.

I am a biologist from the University of Barcelona and hold an MSc in Environmental Forestry from the University of Wales and a PhD in Geography from King’s College London, UK where I served as a Visiting Research Fellow (2004-2007). In 1998 I moved to Colombia and I am a Full Professor of Landscape Ecology at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, where I also lead the Ecolmod research group. My research focuses on landscape ecology applied to conservation biology, including the dynamics, causes, and consequences of deforestation, spatial ecology, and the impacts of climate change on biodiversity. I also investigate the responses of forests and biodiversity to human-induced disturbances and specialize in fire ecology, risk reduction, adaptation to climate change and the use of evidence-based conservation. I have actively contributed to the science policy interface by proposing and demonstrating solutions, pathways, and policy-relevant options.

I am a member of the Colombian Academy of Sciences, and of the Science Panel for the Amazon. Since late 2022, I have been a member of the new UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) Science-Policy Interface (SPI), and as of June 2023, have served as a Member of the Multidisciplinary Expert Scientific Advisory Group (MESAG) for the seventh edition of the Global Environment Outlook (GEO-7).

 

More
Jairo Leonardo Cuervo Andrade
Agricultural scientist and professor at the National University of Colombia.

I am an agricultural scientist focused on soils, integrated and sustainable cultivation systems, and urban agriculture. I have studied the impacts of agrochemicals on diverse soil types throughout Colombia, from the paramos of the high Andes to the lower Amazon. I have also developed community projects, both in isolated areas and with indigenous communities, and also with groups of urban farmers in Bogota. I have an interest in collaborating with experts in other disciplines to help better understand the broad impacts of community-based agriculture on individuals and society, such as with mental health professionals, medical researchers, ecologists and even spiritual leaders.

More
Login or Join our community to leave a comment
Share this article
A nexus for collaborative content, dialogue, understanding and action in an interconnected world
Share this article
No data was found
No data was found
9

Related Publications

August 5, 2026
For Afro-Pacific communities, biodiversity and cultural heritage are not separate concerns—protecting one means protecting the other. Their interrelation makes a compelling case for biocultural heritage as a framework for research, governance, and conservation.
Rowan-Glass_Bogota_8-17-22
Rowan Glass
Contributors
July 16, 2026
Earth’s Memory, Part One Abstract Every rock carries a fragment of Earth’s memory. Collectively, these fragments preserve an extraordinary geological record spanning more than 4.5 billion years of planetary evolution. This article traces that record through the deep-time history of our planet—from the formation of Earth’s earliest crust and the Great Oxidation Event, when microbial life transformed the planet’s atmosphere, to the five great mass extinctions that repeatedly reset the trajectory of life, and the Snowball Earth episodes, when our planet experienced its most extreme glaciation. Drawing on more than two decades of fieldwork across Himalaya and Peninsular India, among ancient rocks, minerals, and fossils that bear direct witness to these planetary transformations, it explores how geologists reconstruct Earth’s early history from evidence preserved in the geological archives. Taken together, these geological events reveal a recurring pattern: Earth is a dynamic system in which every major crisis has also created the conditions for new and often more complex forms of life to evolve. That pattern, written into rocks billions of years old, continues to shape the planet today.    I first learned to listen to rocks long before I had the words to describe what that meant.  It began in the Himalaya, the youngest mountain range on Earth, still rising, still deforming, and still recording the ongoing collision between continents. During my early fieldwork, I spent long days mapping folded strata, tracing fault scarps, and trying to understand how landscapes preserve evidence of processes operating across vastly different geological timescales. At that time, I often felt that the mountains were trying to say something in a language I had not yet learned. Over time, through fieldwork, mapping, and countless hours spent among rocks and sediments, I began to decipher that silent language.  The lesson deepened across many other landscapes of India....
Jai
Jaishri Sanwal Bhatt
Contributors
January 29, 2026
Is self-organization the answer to the foundational question of why life exhibits such complexity? And can it also serve as a guiding framework for how best to save complex webs of biodiversity amid the onslaughts of the modern world? Self-organization exists throughout nature and socioeconomic structures. It refers to the spontaneous emergence of collective, complex order within a disordered system, due to localized interactions that follow simple rules, and occurring without external controls. While conceptually abstract, given that uncertainty lies at its core, the applications of self-organization are everywhere. Advancing our understanding of the non-linear processes within complex systems that drive self-organization is also becoming increasingly important for developing evidence-based policies in a world defined by interdependence and escalating stressors. Indigenous cultures, such as those that live within complex socio-ecological systems in the Amazon ecoregion, have long embraced these principles of uncertainty, interconnectedness, and non-linear dynamics. How will their wisdom, experience, and models of socio-ecological systems integrate with evidence-based policies for protecting the Amazon ecoregion? Safeguarding the Amazon is one of our world’s most pressing, complex, and vital global challenges. Among the strategies gaining traction, supported by increasing financial investment, is the intriguing proposition to transform a portion of the region’s immense biodiversity into a sustainable “bioeconomy.” However, these proposals, and the policy makers responsible for negotiating their implementation across boundaries and cultures, often lack an understanding of how both economies and ecologies self-organize and scale. Data-driven models of self-organization and critical collective phenomena in the natural world and within traditional Indigenous sociocultural structures, along with adaptive context-based frameworks, can help guide the transboundary development of a decentralized and circular socio-bioeconomy for the Amazon. Self-Organized Criticality and the Edge of Chaos Pioneering research on self-organized criticality (SOC) began in the 1980s and was made accessible to a wider audience by...
DSC07445
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
December 15, 2025
In the context of risk management and in the face of environmental and economic challenges such as climate change, coastal erosion, water insecurity, and the accelerated loss of biodiversity, among others, the concept of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) has emerged. Over the past decade, this appealing concept has been consolidated as an integrative approach that seeks to address socio-environmental challenges through the sustainable management of socio-ecological systems.  The United Nations Environment Assembly defines NbS as “actions that protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural or modified ecosystems to effectively and adaptively address societal challenges, simultaneously providing benefits for human well-being and biodiversity.” In this way, NbS represents a paradigm shift from traditional solutions based exclusively on grey infrastructure, which are now insufficient in facing many large and complex contemporary challenges. The relevance of NbS resides in their capacity to generate multiple, synergistic benefits through ecosystem services and the strengthening of socio-ecological resilience. This approach recognizes the interdependence of nature and culture, and much of its success depends on how communities perceive and acknowledge the multiple benefits socio-ecological systems provide for human well-being. Therefore, NbS must emphasize the need for participatory, equitable, and inclusive processes to ensure their legitimacy and long-term sustainability. NbS encompass actions for the protection, restoration, and sustainable management of ecosystems. Although they offer multifunctional and cost-effective benefits, their implementation faces diverse challenges. Several international frameworks acknowledge NbS as priority strategies to confront climate change and biodiversity loss, promoting guidelines for their adoption at different scales. Among these frameworks are the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992), the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), the Sendai Framework (2015–30), and the Paris Agreement (2015). However, it is not enough to only secure financing or display technical feasibility. It is also necessary to establish a coherent legal framework, generate open and...
PeriodicoUNAL-090623-03-am - Mancera-cut
Jose Ernesto Mancera Pineda
Contributors
November 24, 2025
Investment in science is a pillar for any dynamic, equitable modern society, and promoting scientific literacy across all levels of society can help foster innovation, dialogue, and consensus that crosses disciplinary and cultural boundaries. Science also helps to uncover answers to foundational questions that have captivated, confounded, and divided our species for millennia. But what is “science,” and what kind of “evidence” ensures that an approach is scientific? If we take “science” to broadly mean, in its purest sense, a “dynamic search for the truth,” or more explicitly, “the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence,” as the Science Council aptly defines it, then science extends beyond the established, highly specialized disciplines of reductionist natural sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, geoscience, and space science) that have been so successful in fostering our understanding of our planet and the cosmos. Under this definition, science also includes the rigorous data-driven (qualitative and quantitative) social sciences, the inherently non-reductionist “holistic” sciences such as ecological and Earth system sciences, and the budding interdisciplinary field of complex systems science, as well as robust traditional knowledge systems based on multi-generational experiences, observations, and reasoning. As with science, “evidence” can mean a lot of things as well, including primary research, pre-existing data, past and planned experiments, and the referencing of peer-reviewed publications and primary sources. It can also include local and traditional knowledge, thought experiments, theoretical proofs, contemplation, verifiable personal experience, and empirical observation. Broadening and weaving together these forms of scientific evidence holds the potential to address complex, interconnected global challenges and explain deep mysteries that could help unify our polarized societies around foundational understandings. Foundational Questions Foundational questions can transcend the divides of generations and cultures: Cosmology, physics, and evolutionary biology have shed...
DSC07445
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
November 10, 2025
Earth Observation technologies are becoming increasingly valuable for understanding our changing world. They are also critical for formulating policies to protect ecosystems and support local communities. The availability of imagery taken from satellites, airplanes, and drones offers opportunities to detect deforestation, glacier melting, crop productivity, hurricane alerts, ocean temperatures, and much more. These applications have become wide-spread and are commonly featured in the news and on social media; an informed public can now be acutely aware of the significant effects that humans have on the landscape. However, other processes of land use change are too complex to be detected and understood solely from space. For example, detecting rich minerals, tracking illicit land activities (e.g., coca farming), and monitoring water salinity. For these and other complex land changes, the imagery itself might not be enough to understand the processes shaping these changes in the landscape. New ways of addressing these are needed. About 26 years ago, Jacqueline Geoghegan and her co authors wrote a chapter in the book People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science, titled “Socializing the Pixel and Pixelizing the Social in Land-Use and Land-Cover Change.” This chapter was a pioneering step forward in extracting more information from images and linking them with the social processes behind them. It helped me during my PhD studies and subsequent research to develop a strategy for connecting quantitative data from pixels with social mechanisms that impact land change. But how do these two approaches work together? The full Interdialogue with Paulo Murillo. The role of classification in traditional land use science relies on how effectively we can classify elements on the land surface. Classification is the most relevant task in remote sensing. We want to classify or differentiate between forests and agricultural fields or among diverse types of crops using...
new_paulo
Paulo Murillo
Contributors

Login

Sign up to get The InterPlex newsletter

Update Password

Update Password *
Confirm New Password *