Ashish Kothari: Biocultural Diversity in India, Rights of Nature, and Earthy Governance

Ashish Kothari
Indian environmentalist and author working at the development–environment interface. A founder and coordinator of Kalpavriksh, Vikalp Sangam, Global Tapestry of Alternatives and Radical Ecological Democracy.
A nexus for collaborative content, dialogue, understanding and action in an interconnected world

Ashish Kothari is an Indian environmentalist, author, and founding member of Kalpavriksh, a non-profit working on environmental and social justice issues at local, national, and global scales. He has taught at the Indian Institute of Public Administration and the National Law School of India University in Bengaluru, coordinated India’s National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan process, and serves as a judge on the International Tribunal on the Rights of Nature. He also helps coordinate the Vikalp Sangam alternatives confluence, the Global Tapestry of Alternatives, and the Radical Ecological Democracy initiative. Over more than four decades, he has authored, co-authored, or edited more than 30 books, along with hundreds of articles.

In this wide-ranging InterDialogue, Kothari traces his path from a childhood watching Delhi’s urban forests disappear into a lifetime of environmental and social justice work, and how that activism grew into Kalpavriksh and wider networks like the Vikalp Sangam, the ICCA Consortium, and the Global Tapestry of Alternatives. We discuss the biocultural and ideological diversity of the Indian subcontinent, his concept of “outscaling” as an alternative to conventional growth models, and how Adivasi and indigenous rights in India compare with frameworks in Latin America, shaped by very different histories of colonization and violence. Kothari also reflects on decades of writing—from a self-published newsletter in 1980 to the hundred-essay volume Pluriverse—and how it has supported grassroots movements and reached younger generations.

We go on to explore the rights of nature movement in India—including the personhood granted to the Ganga and Yamuna rivers and the transboundary politics of South Asia’s rivers—before Kothari lays out earthy governance, his framework for moving beyond the legal limits of rights of nature toward a form of decision-making in which the rest of the natural world is already part of the process, illustrated through examples from a threatened forest community in Mumbai to a girl’s account of a river’s “right to sing.” We discuss what this kind of ecological consciousness might mean for cities and displaced communities, the role of language and art in keeping it alive, and Kothari’s framework of Radical Ecological Democracy and the “flower of transformation” approach of the Vikalp Sangam process, before closing on the potential, and the obstacles, for bridging natural sciences and indigenous knowledge systems.

Timestamps

0:00 – Introduction

2:30 – From Delhi’s forests to environmental activism

5:04 – Founding Kalpavriksh and global alternatives networks

8:11 – Building international collaborations and community conservation

12:41 – Biocultural diversity and cross-cultural dialogue in South Asia

18:23 – Academic collaboration and ideological divides in Vikalp Sangam

21:58 – Adivasi populations and indigenous identity in India

23:55 – Indigenous rights in India versus Latin America

27:33 – The Forest Rights Act and territorial self-rule

29:36 – Colonization, disease, and violence across regions

31:45 – Writing for the public over academia

36:04 – Pluriverse, young readers, and Gen Z movements

41:10 – The rights of nature movement in India

47:07 – Transboundary rivers and political borders

50:31 – Earthy governance beyond rights of nature

57:13 – Bringing ecological consciousness to cities

58:57 – Displacement and the loss of nature’s voice

1:02:54 – Language, metaphor, and the voice of the river

1:03:50 – Reviving tradition through art and music

1:05:05 – Radical ecological democracy and the flower of transformation

1:10:04 – Bridging natural sciences and indigenous knowledge

1:16:11 – Breaking down academic silos

1:20:27 – Closing thoughts and final reflections

Ashish Kothari
Indian environmentalist and author working at the development–environment interface. A founder and coordinator of Kalpavriksh, Vikalp Sangam, Global Tapestry of Alternatives and Radical Ecological Democracy.

Environment and wildlife have been passions since high school in Delhi, when (in 1978-79) I helped found Kalpavriksh, a non-profit organisation in India which deals with environmental and development issues. From that time onwards I’ve been associated with peoples’ movements like Narmada Bachao Andolan and Beej Bachao Andolan.

I finished my Masters in Sociology in the mid-1980s, but did not continue in regular academics. From then till the mid-1990s I taught environmental issues at Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA), New Delhi, though I was involved more in this period both with Kalpavriksh and with a series of research projects on environment, biodiversity, and wildlife at IIPA. Subsequently I’ve been a guest faculty at several universities and institutes, including as Mellon Fellow at Bowdoin College, USA, and as Professor of Practice at National Law School of India University, Bengaluru.

Through my work on wildlife and biodiversity policy issues, and the interface amongst conservation, governance and livelihoods, I was a member of the Steering Committees of the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) and IUCN Commission on Environmental, Economic, and Social Policy (CEESP) from 1998 to 2008. I helped initiate, and co-chaired the IUCN Inter-commission Strategic Direction on Governance, Equity, and Livelihoods in Relation to Protected Areas (TILCEPA) from 1998 to 2008. I was also fortunate to serve on the steering group or governing board of the CBD (Convention on Biodiversity) Alliance, the ICCA Consortium (another global forum I helped initiate), and Greenpeace International. For over a decade I’ve also been on Greenpeace India’s Board, including for 7 years as its chair.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, I was a member of some Government of India committees, including Environmental Appraisal Committee on River Valley Projects of the Ministry of Environment and Forests, the committee to Assess Implementation of the Forest Rights Act, and Committees to draft the National Wildlife Action Plan and India’s Biological Diversity Act. Most exciting was the opportunity to coordinate, on behalf of Kalpavriksh, India’s National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan process in 2000-2003, commissioned by the Government of India.

During this entire period I’ve remained involved with critiquing ‘development’, and supporting people’s movements against the destruction caused by development projects. But I’ve also felt increasingly unsatisfied with a predominantly critical perspective, and the urge to work on radical alternatives to development as emerging from people’s own efforts in India and elsewhere. This became especially acute when co-writing the book Churning the Earth with Aseem Shrivastava, which critiqued economic globalisation but also presented a preliminary view of alternatives. So I helped start the Vikalp Sangam (Alternatives Confluence) process, as a forum for organisations and individuals working on alternatives in various fields across India to come together; I currently help coordinate this as part of Kalpavriksh.

During these years our global connections also continued growing, from the initial processes within IUCN and then the ICCA Consortium, amidst others. From 2016 to 2019 I co-coordinated the Academic-Activist Co-produced Knowledge for Environmental Justice (ACKnowl-EJ) project, an international, multi-partner process sponsored by the International Social Science Council. In 2016 I also suggested at an international forum, the establishment of a global process similar to Vikalp Sangam. This finally came into being, in 2019, as the Global Tapestry of Alternatives, which I am currently on a core team of. I’ve also been for the past 3-4 years a member of the Global Working Group ‘Beyond Development’, and more recently became an Associate Fellow of the Tellus Institute. I am a judge on the International Tribunal on Rights of Nature and a co-founder of Radical Ecological Democracy.

Since the early Kalpavriksh years I’ve been passionate about writing. Over these 40+ years, I’ve been privileged to have been able to author/co-author, and co-edit about 30 books, including Churning the Earth, Alternative Futures, and Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary, and write/co-write more than 600 articles.

Some day I hope to acknowledge, by name, the numerous people who I have learnt from, who have been incredible friends and colleagues in this journey of several decades, my immediate and extended family members who have provided the love and nurture every individual needs … human and beyond-human. As the southern African worldview of Ubuntu says, ‘I am, because we are’.

More
Login or Join our community to leave a comment
Share this InterDialogue
A nexus for collaborative content, dialogue, understanding and action in an interconnected world
Share this InterDialogue
10
August 5, 2026
For Afro-Pacific communities, biodiversity and cultural heritage are not separate concerns—protecting one means protecting the other. Their interrelation makes a compelling case for biocultural heritage as a framework for research, governance, and conservation.
Rowan-Glass_Bogota_8-17-22
Rowan Glass
Contributors
January 29, 2026
Is self-organization the answer to the foundational question of why life exhibits such complexity? And can it also serve as a guiding framework for how best to save complex webs of biodiversity amid the onslaughts of the modern world? Self-organization exists throughout nature and socioeconomic structures. It refers to the spontaneous emergence of collective, complex order within a disordered system, due to localized interactions that follow simple rules, and occurring without external controls. While conceptually abstract, given that uncertainty lies at its core, the applications of self-organization are everywhere. Advancing our understanding of the non-linear processes within complex systems that drive self-organization is also becoming increasingly important for developing evidence-based policies in a world defined by interdependence and escalating stressors. Indigenous cultures, such as those that live within complex socio-ecological systems in the Amazon ecoregion, have long embraced these principles of uncertainty, interconnectedness, and non-linear dynamics. How will their wisdom, experience, and models of socio-ecological systems integrate with evidence-based policies for protecting the Amazon ecoregion? Safeguarding the Amazon is one of our world’s most pressing, complex, and vital global challenges. Among the strategies gaining traction, supported by increasing financial investment, is the intriguing proposition to transform a portion of the region’s immense biodiversity into a sustainable “bioeconomy.” However, these proposals, and the policy makers responsible for negotiating their implementation across boundaries and cultures, often lack an understanding of how both economies and ecologies self-organize and scale. Data-driven models of self-organization and critical collective phenomena in the natural world and within traditional Indigenous sociocultural structures, along with adaptive context-based frameworks, can help guide the transboundary development of a decentralized and circular socio-bioeconomy for the Amazon. Self-Organized Criticality and the Edge of Chaos Pioneering research on self-organized criticality (SOC) began in the 1980s and was made accessible to a wider audience by...
DSC07445
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
September 21, 2024
Integrated interpretations of rivers as vital and interconnected living and evolving entities have extensive practical application — from their revered preservation throughout Indigenous territories, to modern adaptations of holistic Indigenous worldviews, to advances in integrated research and policy whose goals are conservation, restoration and mitigation.
DSC07445
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
Contributors
September 19, 2024
Traditional Indigenous territories are complex, adaptable, and resilient socio-ecological systems that contain the majority of the world’s biocultural diversity. But can Indigenous Peoples play a leading role in both combating climate change and preventing the next pandemic? Right now, there is a fair amount of rhetoric being flung about connecting, comparing, and contrasting the COVID-19 pandemic to climate change and the “sixth extinction” of biodiversity. In Indigenous worldviews—as well as in complex systems science—all these crises represent “maladies” caused by the profound unbalancing of our interconnected living planet. From his home in self-isolation in the Colombian Amazon, Koreguaje Indigenous leader Juven Piranga recently told me: “Our Elders agree that Mother Earth is causing this pandemic to clean the present state of the world, to rid us of the bad energies, and to counteract the pervasive greed and exploitation and disrespect. White people come here to our territories to exploit Mother Earth, for gold and timber and much more, and this affects everyone, and it is our responsibility to protect Mother Earth, so we are also punished. We need to reinforce our autonomy to stop these practices and restore balance.” While still not garnering nearly as much attention as it deserves, Indigenous Peoples’ role as partners in climate change mitigation is fairly well established in research, and gaining more attention internationally from both policymakers and the general public. The “Guardians of the Forest” paradigm recognizes Indigenous communities as stewards of the immense biodiversity and “ecosystem services” (or better, ecosystem functions) of tropical forests. Globally, the forested territories of Indigenous communities store at least 300 billion metric tons of carbon, above and below ground. Mounting evidence has shown that Indigenous communities with secure rights and tenure to their collectively held lands have extremely low rates of deforestation and land degradation. Additionally, while...
DSC07445
Daniel Henryk Rasolt
Contributors
No data was found

Related Interdialogues

Jordi Soriano: Neurophysics, Neuronal Cultures, Neurodegenerative Disease, and Augmented Humans

K. Brandon Barker: Anthropomorphism, Cognition, Human Exceptionalism, Computational Folklore, and AI

Arnab Bhattacharya: Science Communication and Education, Public Health, Semiconductors, and Energy Technologies in India

Marta González: Complexity, Urban Sciences, Mobility Data, and Sustainable Cities in Latin America

Javier Buldú: Complexity, Football, AI, and Networks of Networks

Ciro Cattuto: Computational Social Science, Interdisciplinarity, Complexity, and AI

Login

Sign up to get The InterPlex newsletter

Update Password

Update Password *
Confirm New Password *